Useful outcome: Design two labels for stated purposes without claiming all readers want them.
Prepare: O6 complete perspectives/action record; blank caption mat.
Partial opportunities: AC9HS1S03, AC9HS1S04, AC9HS1S05, AC9HS1S06. Refer to whole authority and explicit limits in the linked curriculum scope; opportunity is not observed mastery.
-
Start ·3: Read child invitation I07 in the ordinary source menu. Invite a wanted useful product. Offer private work, rest, pass, stop or another route.
-
Source/model ·5: Fresh fictional desk users ask for colour-first/name-first labels. Those purposes do not establish successful searching. Adult demonstration stays separate from child evidence.
-
Guided source work ·part of 10: Read O6. Tali wants the date beside the object description; Evan wants the rules beside the game name. Mina looked for the maker field; the source records no result. These are three particular views/actions, not diagnoses or results from our children.
-
Own useful work ·rest of 10: Child proposes two useful caption arrangements tied to Tali's and Evan's stated purposes, and leaves the maker unknown. They may choose no personal preference. Keep Mina's actual supplied lookup separate from its missing outcome.
-
Compare ·5: Ask which source phrase supports each design choice. If a willing person actually tries a find task today, record their actual reply separately and only with their permission; no reply means none recorded, not nobody ever looked.
-
Notice and teach next ·2: If a preference is called a successful result, use fresh fictional route-card “want to find gate” versus no trial. If a named view becomes everyone's need, compare two fresh invented music-list users with different chosen purposes.
Three ways to take part
(a) Caption design studio: Make date-first and rule-first paper arrangements for the two supplied views.
(b) Purpose interview in fiction: Ask a helper to read the two O6 wishes; child directs a label change and names whose wish it fits.
(c) Reader find rehearsal: Use exact description/AAC/linear text to explain the two layouts; a genuine optional trial is recorded separately.
All routes retain the access/attribution/stop choices above. Observe: Discussion of two attributed purposes, a source-based proposal and action/result distinction.
Extra contexts: C13/C14; home: H07; optional larger making: X07; written read-aloud: N07. Full source/own/staff separation follows the linked assessment selection guidance.
Complete selected sources
O6 — Two purposes and one lookup
Original fiction, collection-label discussion recorded 2026. Tali says: “I want the date beside the object description so I can find when the account is set.” Evan says: “I want the rules beside the game name so I can find what players do.” A third fictional person, Mina, looked for the maker field. The source records that lookup but no result or reply. The collection has a described paper game; its maker is unknown. These are particular supplied purposes, not diagnoses, universal reader needs or evidence about current pupils. Neither design is recorded as tested.
Short child start · Home · Larger project · Capture/support · Curriculum scope.
Sources and reuse · Original educational work © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0. Linked authority/provider exceptions and learner ownership stay separate.