Development draft · local review needed

Day 12 · Read the whole method note · AC9S10I02 · AC9S10I06…Year 10 Inquiry · T1 W3–4 · Day 12 lesson

Prepare this lesson

Year 10 / Integrated / Term 1 / Weeks 03 04

Part of the full two-week lesson sequence. Check the pack guide and taught point before teaching.

Open for this lesson: Pack guide · Fresh learner checks · Aids and text routes.

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Learner prompts

35 = 3 + 7 + 12 + 8 + 5. Goal: distinguish documented method, repeatability and missing controls.

0–3: Read Source D exactly; learners mark what the maker did and what the maker did not record.
3–10: Model action / recorded setting / missing source of variation / next step: one maker, one printer setting, missing paper stock/contrast/reviewer agreement. Do not invent new observations.
10–22: Teams use the method mat to propose a six-step repeatable paper check: same print file, recorded stock/setting, predeclared border rule, labelled sheets, two independent coders, disagreement log. Write not observed for all new results.
22–30: Routes: order tactile procedure cards; annotate a large-print method flow; write or speak/AAC a reproducible protocol. Another team finds one instruction still too vague and author revises it. No physical printing is required.
30–35: Exit: “Can a written method prove that two reviewers agreed?” Key: no; agreement requires an actual check. Move: split planned from observed columns.

Alternate domain: An invented poster crop-check protocol. Optional/home: verbally specify what a second checker would need; do not ask anyone to participate.

Source: https://neuroforge.io/subjectnest/library/resources/year-10/integrated/term-1/weeks-03-04/day-12 · Original material © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026 · CC BY 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ · Credit the source and note changes. External sources keep their own terms.