Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.
Goal: compare Card H and revise the public post within the confirmed trial boundary. Teacher says: “A welcome can be accurate and still inviting.”
0–2: Read the two texts and mark their audiences.
2–7: Model underlining “trial screening on Friday” and “do not promise availability at another screening”.
7–13: Ask what a public reader may infer from “ready”; record an uncertainty rather than assume supply beyond Friday.
13–20: Revise the post and add a one-sentence explanation tied to the internal note.
20–25: Peer-check for both invitation and accuracy; remove unsupported promises.
Routes: written revised post and explanation; recorded spoken public announcement plus written source note; labelled post mock-up with dictated rationale. Alternative domains:Day 8 swaps. Optional/home: write a fictional event update with a clear date and limit. Move: if students make the post sound forbidding, ask how a visitor could still find a useful next step.