SubjectNest resource library

Year 2 / Supplementary / Term 1 / Weeks 03 04

Development draft · local review needed

Desk run-through · teacher, learner and potential funderYear 2 Subjects · T1 W3–4 · Run Through

Download editable text

Date: 29 September 2026. This is a paper and rendered-asset run-through, not a classroom trial. No child, educator or funder was observed using the pack, and no actual sky, movement, sound, drama or media performance was sampled. The counts below describe authored opportunities, not learner outcomes.

Teacher route: can a new teacher run the block?

  1. Open the pack index, choose one of 40 optional blocks and read its setup. The science, HASS and HPE pages each offer Days 11–20; the Arts page has exactly two days for each of Dance, Drama, Media Arts, Music and Visual Arts. Each block has a 2 + 7 + 3 = 12 minute sequence, a concrete prompt, access/home route and staff evidence limit.
  2. For Science Day 15, prepare the unseen invented two-time strip; withhold the staff key. The learner can order 8:30 and 11:30, compare 6 and 3, and state “invented”. A teacher can see exactly whether the child compared lengths or made an unsupported all-days inference. Maths checked: 6 − 3 = 3.
  3. For HASS Day 20, check the different museum record and read the original learner paraphrase. The staff key explicitly limits inference to this item and its stated use span. If the source is unavailable, defer the real-source claim and use a fictional source-identification rehearsal instead.
  4. For HPE Day 20, reserve a safe clear route and separately record plan, movement, fair-rule use and cooperation. If only tabletop work is possible, record planning and tabletop manipulation; leave physical-action cells not yet observed. The child may pause or opt for a different route.
  5. For Arts Day 18, a media tool must actually be used for media-technology evidence. A paper storyboard remains a valid design prompt but must be recorded as preparation. For Days 14/19 music, sound or listening must actually happen for sound evidence; a silent pattern card alone cannot stand in.

Teacher finding: The day-by-day prompts and separate staff notes are executable for a short slot with ordinary paper materials. Real local maps, genuine sky observation, a safe movement space and school-approved media equipment are conditional inputs, never asserted present. The pack does not supply a full Year 2 timetable or substitute for local curriculum and teacher judgement.

Learner route: can a student use the visible page?

Learner finding: The pages have short action prompts, optional ways to answer and ordinary-life contexts. A child who needs a spoken, tactile, AAC or partner-directed response has a route into the central task. Reading demand still depends on adult support and individual needs; no universal accessibility or engagement result is claimed.

Potential funder route: what is verifiable and what remains to prove?

Funder finding: This is a usable, auditable two-week supplementary slice with a clear cost/access story and honest evidence boundaries. It is an authored prototype, not a proven year-long, state-complete or impact-validated programme.