Codes: AC9E9LA06, AC9E9LY04. Goal: summarise actions in a literary scene with a defensible abstract noun and distinguish interpretation from fact. Prepare: original fiction Text D and agency lens.
- Launch · 2 min. Read The third turn. Ask what Mica does on the page: writes, crosses out, walks, folds.
- Model · 5 min. “Mica wrote left and crossed it out. That hesitation shapes the pause that follows.”
Hesitationsummarises actions; the writer infers a state. Do not assert that Mica has a diagnosed trait or feels an exact emotion. - Guided reading · 6 min. Compare
the hesitation,the silence,the certainty. Which is most defensible from the text? Hesitation/silence have textual cues; certainty conflicts with correction. Ask how “silence felt heavier than the clipboard” shapes mood without being a weight claim. - Practice route · 6 min. D16-A/B/C: scene annotation, concise spoken summary or unsupported-abstract-noun critique. Each points to exact action and labels inference.
- Exit · 4 min. Write/say one noun that summarises the crossing-out and one detail supporting it. Accept “uncertainty” with explanation; reject “failure” as a fact unless carefully framed as interpretation.
- Evidence note · 2 min. If a learner offers a different plausible reading, ask for a text detail rather than enforcing one emotion.
Later: Day16 extra turns the scene into a four-line script.