Every source below is fictional. The one-page SVGs include title/description; PDFs have selectable text but are untagged. These linear words and broad-region directions give an alternative without relying on colour, a screen, hearing, fine cut pieces or a visual pattern. An adult can draw four large boxes, read the exact source and accept child-directed pointing, signing or AAC. “Day 1/2” is story order, not real time or a family celebration.
1. Ripple Hall invitation · PDF
Title: “Ripple Hall invitation.” Subtitle: “Source A: a fictional future invitation.” A top line says SOURCE A · FICTIONAL DAY 1 INVITATION. Main card: RIPPLE HALL PAPER-CARD SHOW. “Tomorrow, on Story Day 2, we plan to show two large paper cards in our invented Ripple Hall.” Bottom: “This is an invitation and plan on Story Day 1. It does not show that the show happened. No family event or real hall is described.” Tactile route: one broad INVITATION panel, then a separate NOT-A-REPORT panel. Leave actual attendance unknown.
2. Ripple Hall display plan · PDF
Title: “Ripple Hall display plan.” Subtitle: “Source B: Miri's imagined wall/table arrangement.” Top: SOURCE B · FICTIONAL DAY 1 PLAN. Under MIRI'S PAPER DISPLAY PLAN, a broad left box says WALL PANEL — Plan: two large cards. A broad right box says TABLE — Plan: one broad empty card box. Bottom: “A plan says what Miri intends, not what occurred. No real event, route or access result is supplied.” Tactile route: two large side-by-side regions, WALL PANEL left and TABLE right. Read each as a plan, not an observed layout.
3. Ripple Hall after-note · PDF
Title: “Ripple Hall after-note.” Subtitle: “Source C: Nia's attributed fictional report.” Top: SOURCE C · FICTIONAL DAY 2 NOTE. Main: NIA writes: “I saw two large paper cards on the WALL PANEL: one curved-line card and one dot card.” Bottom: “This is Nia's invented report, not our own visit. It says nothing about the planned table box.” Tactile route: one REPORT panel and a separate UNKNOWN TABLE BOX panel. The class did not visit any place.
4. Two Ripple Hall views · PDF
Title: “Two Ripple Hall views.” Subtitle: “Sources D and E: Nia and Tao differ.” Top: SOURCES D AND E · IMAGINED VIEWS. Upper broad region NIA says: “I liked seeing the curved-line card on the wall panel.” Lower broad region TAO says: “I would rather have a large card on the table to look at.” Last box: “Two fictional views; neither speaks for everyone.” Tactile route: Nia above Tao in two large panels. Tao's wish is not a report that a table card was displayed.
5. Invitation to report trail · PDF
Title: “Invitation to report trail.” Subtitle: “Four broad source-sequence fields.” Intro: “Sort what was invited, planned, reported and unknown.” Four stacked blank fields with writing lines: DAY 1 INVITATION · A — “What did A invite people to?”; DAY 1 PLAN · B — “What did Miri intend to place?”; DAY 2 REPORT · C — “What did Nia say she saw?”; STILL UNKNOWN — “What was not reported or checked?” Tactile route: four broad strips from top to bottom; A and B share Story Day 1, so do not invent their within-day order.
6. Place story and care mat · PDF
Title: “Place story and care mat.” Subtitle: “View, proposal and unknown stay separate.” Intro: “Say whose words they are and what is still unknown.” Four stacked blank fields: SOURCE / FEATURE — “What does an exact source say or show?”; WHOSE VIEW? — “Nia, Tao, or another source?”; POSSIBLE CARE MESSAGE — “What could be tried with approval?”; RESULT NOT YET SHOWN — “What would need a real check?” Tactile route: four large horizontal regions, one spoken or marked response each. Do not treat a proposal as evidence of change.
7. Check A: Cloud Room · PDF
Title: “Check A: Cloud Room.” Subtitle: “Three new fictional sources; plan versus report.” Top: FRESH CHECK A · FICTIONAL CLOUD ROOM. Source 1, STORY DAY 1 INVITATION: “Tomorrow we plan to show large shape cards in Cloud Room.” Source 2, STORY DAY 1 PLAN: “Put cards on the BLUE RAIL and an empty broad box on the TABLE.” Source 3, STORY DAY 2 NOTE: SOL writes: “I saw one triangle card on the blue rail.” Last line: “The note does not mention the table box.” Tactile route: three large source strips in printed order; Sources 1/2 share Day 1 and Source 3 is Day 2. The separate learner questions do not need a visual page.
8. Check B: Quiet Card Nook · PDF
Title: “Check B: Quiet Card Nook.” Subtitle: “New drawing, plan and attributed views.” Top: FRESH CHECK B · FICTIONAL QUIET CARD NOOK. Source 1 DRAWING has two broad side-by-side regions: a wide tabletop with two legs labelled WIDE TABLE on the LEFT, and a long rectangular LABEL STRIP on the RIGHT. The line below reads “WIDE TABLE LEFT · LABEL STRIP RIGHT. No box is drawn.” Source 2 MAKER'S PLAN: “We could add one broad card box.” Source 3 UMI says: “I like the label strip.” Source 4 DEX says: “I would like a card box on the table.” Last line: “No added box or real result is shown.” Tactile route: left/right broad drawing regions with a tabletop on the left and one horizontal strip on the right, then three separate plan/speaker strips. Keep the proposed box absent from the drawing. The learner questions can be read aloud.
Every page footers state “SubjectNest original Foundation HASS W7–8 · CC BY 4.0.” DejaVu typeface rights are in the font licence; no font binary is distributed.