SubjectNest resource library

Foundation / Hass / Term 3 / Weeks 25 26

Development draft · local review needed

Twenty fully worked everyday-domain transfersFoundation HASS · T3 W25–26 · Practice Swaps

Download editable text

These invented swaps keep the day's count, named perspective, claim limit and next question. They are not real child surveys or care outcomes. Fresh check people/features remain outside ordinary practice before first responses.

Day Worked swap 1 Worked swap 2
121 Toy clinic: 3 paper people pick book tray, 2 pick puzzle tray → among these five, book tray got more picks; not all visitors everywhere. Garden game: 2 pick seed bench, 3 pick water picture → five choices shown; actual garden visitors unknown.
122 Library game: 4 choose book pile, 1 chooses drawing pad → counts known; why each chose is not on the board. Sports play: 3 choose target A, 2 target B → chosen target known; comfort and access not shown.
123 Market play: Eli says “I like the crate for sorting” → Eli's reason; an anonymous tally cannot identify Eli's token. Bus-play stop: Ari says “I like the shade card for reading” → Ari's view alone, not every passenger.
124 Pet-care game: Kim says brush shelf helps Kim find tools; Lou says mat gives Lou floor space → different uses, not a group verdict. Café play: Mei likes quiet cup shelf; Sam likes wide drawing counter → two attributed reasons, neither cancels the other.
125 After check only, new practice: 3 choose card box and 2 choose toy shelf → count bounded to five. After check only, new practice: one named visitor explains a choice → name source without assigning them an anonymous vote.
126 Paper pool desk: 4 of 6 pick window; helper says “everyone wants window; remove table” → first count may be true, universal and removal not established. Train-play stall: 2 pick map, 1 ticket; sign says “ticket desk closed” as a plan → no completed closure or outcome shown.
127 Art play: if wide shelf closed, a model-maker might need another surface → ask model-maker/keeper before claiming benefit. Community-play kit: if quiet box moved, a reader might lose a preferred spot → ask whose use changes; do not assume harm occurred.
128 Book exchange: “Will users find new shelf?” → future approved observation could help, but is not yet obtained. Garden-play bench: “Why did Bo choose bench?” → voluntary Bo account could answer; count chart cannot.
129 Food-play menu: two choose pears, one apples; Rai says why Rai likes apples; closure of apple tray is only proposed → explain count, voice and unknown. Game station: three choose cards, two choose blocks; one builder needs blocks → tell both and ask before removal.
130 After final check, new practice: five paper votes favour shade but one named visitor values sun desk → preserve both sources. After final check, new practice: suggested removal of a play mat → planned decision, not action or accessibility result.