A teacher reads each invented source neutrally or offers the exact linear/tactile alternative. Point, speak, sign, use AAC, draw or direct an adult. These are not secure exams. No real preference, vote, family, place, culture, access need or Country/Place information is required. The teacher preserves first responses and prompts before feedback.
Check A · Day 125 · Willow Room
Use the new large A4 illustrated source. This room, choice board and people are invented.
Source 1 · five anonymous choice tokens: “Five pretend visitors each chose one Willow Room feature: four chose the drawing shelf; one chose the quiet mat. The board does not name the five visitors or give their reasons.” The tokens are four shelf squares and one mat circle.
Source 2 · Iri's note: “I choose the quiet mat because I like looking at leaf cards there.” Iri gives Iri's own reason. Source 1 does not say whether Iri is its one mat token.
Source 3 · Ren's note: “I choose the drawing shelf because I can lay out my paper leaves there.” Ren gives Ren's own reason. Source 1 does not identify Ren's token.
- What does Source 1 say about these five choices? Does it prove every Willow Room visitor prefers the shelf?
- Match Iri and Ren to their own reasons and source numbers. Does the anonymous board identify either person?
- A helper says “one mat choice means nobody needs the quiet mat.” Is that conclusion supported? Use a named voice and a count to explain.
- Ask one fair next question before anyone proposed to remove the mat. Name an approved future source or say the matter should stay open.
No actual vote, room change or access outcome occurred.
Check B · Day 130 · Folded Room
Use the new large A4 illustrated source. Every room, choice and person is fictional.
Source 1 · six anonymous choice tokens: “Six pretend visitors each chose one feature: four chose the smooth craft table; two chose the soft reading chair. The board does not name anyone or say why they chose.” Four small rectangles and two round chair icons represent the six choices.
Source 2 · Ori's note: “I choose the reading chair because I like to look at books there.” This is Ori's reason, not everyone else's.
Source 3 · Val's note: “I choose the craft table because I can spread my folded paper there.” This is Val's reason, not every table chooser's.
Source 4 · keeper's paper proposal: “Four chose the table and two chose the chair. Everyone wants making, so we should close the chair tomorrow.” The count matches Source 1. The “everyone” claim does not, and “should close” is a proposal, not an actual closure.
- Give one bounded Source 1 conclusion about the six choices. Does a larger group prove what every visitor values?
- Attribute Ori's and Val's different uses to their own notes. Can the anonymous board tell which token belongs to either?
- Sort Source 4 into a supported count, an unsupported everyone claim and a proposed change. Has any chair actually closed in these sources?
- Ask one careful next question about who might be affected or what source would be needed before a real decision. Do not claim a benefit or harm has happened.
No real care action, decision, accessibility result or child attainment is documented.