SubjectNest resource library

Development draft · local review needed

Day 94 — What did the valid tries actually show?Foundation Science · T2 W19–20 · Day 94 lesson

Prepare this lesson

Foundation / Science / Term 2 / Weeks 19 20

Part of the full two-week lesson sequence. Check the pack guide and taught point before teaching.

Open for this lesson: Pack guide · Sources and materials · Optional practice · Check guide.

Download full sequence

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Learner choices

Goal: make a bounded comparison of four raw attempts and separate genuine evidence from M. Proposed codes: AC9SFU02, AC9SFI02, AC9SFI03, AC9SFI04. Prepare: four-run sheet, claim mat, school-approved apparatus only if safe, otherwise M, Card 94.

  1. Choose source · 3 min. Write ACTUAL with local date/approval/equipment if an investigation is genuinely run; otherwise M FICTIONAL MODEL and REAL OBSERVATION NOT AVAILABLE.
  2. Read prediction · 4 min. Retrieve the actual advance prediction if one exists. If not, mark NO PRIOR PREDICTION; do not manufacture one.
  3. Model raw record · 5 min. Adult models one labelled attempt without a push, or reads M's four original valid entries exactly; retain interruptions.
  4. Child try · 7 min. Under approved conditions adult conducts/records remaining brief attempts or reads M in order. Card 94 routes mark face, position and interruption for each; if too few valid attempts, say insufficient comparison.
  5. Check · 4 min. Compare exact valid stops to the advance prediction with guidance. “In these tries …” is allowed; “this face always slides farther” is not.
  6. Exit · 2 min. Save raw dated genuine record or labelled M and the child's exact bounded claim.