35 = 3 + 7 + 12 + 8 + 5. Goal: iterate a paper prototype plan with a stated criterion and uncertainty.
- 0–3: Return to Source D; list what the sole maker did not log. Do not silently add a second rating.
- 3–10: Teacher models a revised criterion: “For each labelled mock-up printed on specified paper at a recorded setting, two coders independently apply a written border-continuity rule; disagreements are retained.” This is a proposal, not a completed validation.
- 10–22: Teams plan a paper redesign: choose one pattern, specify one visual change (line weight, spacing or contrast), name one measurable paper criterion, a sheet-use tally or suitable-offcut choice, a recording sheet and one uncertainty. No sustainability saving or benefit to a real viewer is claimed.
- 22–30: Routes: large-paper sketch and labelled notes; tactile line/space tokens with dictated design brief; typed step list and simple original vector/ASCII sketch. Peer critique identifies one vague criterion; author visibly revises it. Arts evidence requires an actual learner-created visual artefact in Day 19, not just this discussion.
- 30–35: Exit: “Which result is now observed?” Key: none for the proposed redesign; mark
not observed. Move: separate design choice from test outcome.
Alternate domain: Imagined museum display mock-up without venue claim. Optional/home: plan one paper change with a measurable check; no materials needed.