SubjectNest resource library

Year 10 / Term 1 / Weeks 01 02 / Mathematics

Development draft · local review needed

Transfer cards · teacher key and next movesYear 10 Maths · T1 W1–2 · Transfer Key

Download editable text
Teacher copy · prompts and answer keys

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Use the learner cards after the core teaching or as a later unfamiliar recheck. They are formative: a correct number without units, domain and limitation is incomplete. Record whether the answer was independent or prompted. These invented scenarios do not certify a real pattern, service or offer.

Card Key evidence If incomplete, teach this next
S1 library Positive, fairly strong and roughly linear over four fictional points. The y-value is books placed, not borrowed. A defensible repair: “In these invented displays, longer tables listed more books placed; the sheet gives no borrowing data or causal test.” Book size/arrangement could affect the count. If “borrowed” remains, point to the exact column heading before discussing causation.
S2 audio Positive, strong, approximately linear in this invented set. Sizes 4, 8, 13, 16 MB rise with 1–4 minutes; increments 4, 5, 3 MB are not identical. Codec, bitrate, channel count and export settings are absent, so no universal four-minute size follows. If “perfectly linear,” compare successive y-differences. If “all files,” ask what export settings were controlled.
S3 path Positive, strong, roughly linear over simulated pairs. The 4 km/21 min pair departs from exactly 5 minutes/km (which predicts 20 min). It cannot predict a real person's route, stops or pace. If the exact rule is accepted, substitute 4 km and compare 20 versus 21.
S4 seed tray Height rises 12→15 mm, stays 15, then falls to 14 as hours rise 2→8. No single positive linear claim or “always increases” fits even the authored points. No actual plants, methods or environment were measured. If “negative association” is claimed for the whole set, read pairs in x order and identify rise/plateau/fall.
M1 posters A(n)=25+4n; B(n)=55+2n. Equality 2n=30 → 15 posters, $85. At 10: A $65, B $75; at 20: A $105, B $95. Paper quality unverified. If setup is multiplied by n, identify the one-off charge. If price is called quality, name missing specifications.
M2 music A(h)=40+18h; B(h)=70+12h. Equality 6h=30 → 5 hours, $130. At 6: A $148, B $142; B lower by $6. Actual room access, equipment, cancellation/terms unverified. If an intersection is a dollar amount only, ask for its ordered pair and substitution into both models.
M3 transport Equality 100+8d=40+14d → 60=6d → 10 km, $180. At 5: A $140, B $110; B lower by $30. At 15: A $220, B $250; A lower by $30. Actual load, distance measure and fees absent. If plan ordering never changes, test d=5 and d=15 on both sides of the intersection.
M4 containers Equality 15+5w=27+3w → 2w=12 → 6 weeks, $45. At 8: A $55, B $51; B lower by $4. Cleaning, delivery and suitability absent. If equal price is confused with equal value, ask which service attributes the rule does not contain.

Scoring for feedback: Look for (1) correct source variables, (2) valid mathematical operation, (3) units and domain, and (4) a conclusion bounded to the invented data. If an access route changes the output mode, judge the same four pieces of reasoning and note the support used. A learner may challenge a source claim with a well-supported alternative interpretation. Choose one new card for a later independent recheck rather than repeating an item already modelled.

Reuse: Original SubjectNest keys © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0. Credit source/licence and mark changes.