Each route reaches the same business target. A learner may switch; no route is assigned to a fixed learning style or disability group. “Move” includes pointing to full-word strips while a partner moves them under the learner's direction. “Speak” includes sign/AAC. Log reading or scribing; if the adult supplies a business inference, record it as prompted. A correct spoken case judgement is not evidence of independent reading.
| Day | Route A · annotate/write | Route B · full-word/movable sort | Route C · spoken/digital response | Same target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mark stated, inferred and unknown in two case paragraphs. | Move two cited-detail strips up the evidence ladder and place two unsupported-claim strips below. | Dictate two claim/evidence/limit triples while a reader only reads the cases. | Source-backed distinction, no overclaim. |
| 2 | Write a stage/evidence table for A/B/E/C. | Place full-word case strips at seed/start-up/unknown later-stage slots. | Narrate why each placement follows an explicit case statement. | Bounded life-cycle classification. |
| 3 | Draw purpose→goal→objective→strategy→tactic chain for B. | Order five full-word cards; add 34 and 36 counters and point to gap. | Record the chain, two-order gap and “unproven” qualifier. | Measurable objective versus planned tactic. |
| 4 | Colour-independent table: internal / specific external / macro unknown. | Sort B/C/D evidence strips into three labelled columns, leaving unanswered macro card. | Explain four classifications and ask for wider-trend evidence. | Factor location and evidence limit. |
| 5 | Annotate File G and write a short decision note. | Place G's full-word evidence under stage/internal/external/goal, then dictate a recommendation. | Type or speak the four-part answer from the new case before key access. | Independent first-encounter transfer. |
| 6 | Fill four SWOT boxes and one relationship sentence. | Move D's full-word source strips to S/W/O/T, then connect two with an arrow labelled “may.” | Narrate the four cited placements and one possible implication. | Evidence-backed introductory SWOT. |
| 7 | Make a four-function action grid for B or C. | Match role cards to finance/HR/marketing/operations; join two dependent actions. | Explain four roles and why one function alone cannot guarantee the goal. | Different functions contribute to one goal. |
| 8 | Complete stakeholder/evidence/unknown/question rows for C or E. | Place full-word stakeholder and evidence strips together; leave unsurveyed-preference strip in unknown. | Dictate a nonidentifying, consented feedback question and its limit. | Stakeholder viewpoint versus assumption. |
| 9 | Compute F's projected counts and ratios in the criteria board. | Move 12/16/15/18 counters and $80/$30 cards; direct the four calculations. | Explain numbers and tentative choice aloud/AAC, naming what is unmeasured. | Criterion-led tradeoff and bounded claim. |
| 10 | Work File H with blank SWOT and criteria mats. | Arrange H evidence/number/role cards, then direct a scribe to capture reasons. | Type, speak or AAC the calculations, recommendation and limit. | Independent new-case transfer. |
The four A4 visual/full-text/tactile aids allow the same word order without colour. A slow written response can be finished after the initial seven minutes; the target remains the quality of case reasoning.
SubjectNest original routes © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0.