Goal: calculate two fictional price-to-earnings ratios and reject an unsupported investment ranking. 25 = 2 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 5.
- 0–2: Card N2 gives market price and annual earnings per share for Cedar and Slate. Confirm the units match one share.
- 2–7: Model Cedar
$30÷$2=15and Slate$36÷$3=12. Label both P/E ratios, not 15% and 12%. - 7–13: Learners reverse-check
15×$2=$30,12×$3=$36; list absent growth, debt, risk, accounting quality and time context. Lower P/E alone cannot select a share. - 13–20: Routes: build price strips from repeated earnings-per-share tokens on the share measures aid; fill a two-company comparison table; write/voice two divisions plus a scope sentence. Optional rate switch is not relevant here; use paper or calculator.
- 20–25: Exit “Can we call Slate the better investment because 12<15?” Key: no; ratio alone is insufficient. Move: ask for one missing decision input before any comparative claim.
Alternative domains: wholly fictional publishing or game-studio company cards. Optional/home: make a ratio for invented price $20 and earnings/share $2; no real-market lookup. Two optional swaps.