Offer the three routes without assigning one to a diagnosis. The teacher may read every card aloud without adding content. A partner may help locate a line, then the learner makes the judgement. The teacher records substantial prompting. Each response must name source evidence and a limit, however it is expressed. Print alternatives support large text, tactile positioning and no-colour use.
| Day | Route A · private text | Route B · dialogue/audio | Route C · move/map/AAC | Shared target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Write two questions for A and mark its answer line. | Hear A read; speak/dictate two questions and point to phrase. | Place ANSWERABLE / NEED MORE SOURCE labels beside two typed questions; select evidence by AAC or pointing. | One source can answer a bounded question. |
| 2 | Make a two-row purpose/audience table for A/B. | Interview a partner as “source detective” about maker/purpose; dictate limits. | Sort maker, audience and limit cards under A/B; photograph or label the result. | Compare usefulness for a stated claim. |
| 3 | Write an “although/also/unknown” two-source sentence. | Speak the two claims, using A/B IDs; recorder or teacher transcribes verbatim. | Put A/B/E tokens on stated / question / later view rungs; explain placements. | Distinguish ideal from lived rights. |
| 4 | Draw a dated four-step timeline and one change claim. | Hear four dated events; narrate correct order and state the 1777/1781 distinction. | Order four tactile date cards, then use a labelled arrow for a bounded change. | Keep chronology and event type accurate. |
| 5 | Check A in writing: claim, phrase, limit, next source. | Hear F exactly; give the four parts orally with no content hint. | Use four labelled evidence boxes and dictate/choose source details. | Evaluate a new petition's use and limit. |
| 6 | Write C's Article II claim and non-claim. | Explain aloud who “state” means; identify one missing rights source. | Put “state power” and “personal freedom” tokens into supported / unshown columns with source C. | Scope sovereignty to the document. |
| 7 | Write A/D comparison with dated citations. | Record 30-second comparison; say which source answers recognition. | Connect declaration and recognition cards with two dated arrows; label one unanswered issue. | Distinguish stated independence from recognition. |
| 8 | Write E's type, purpose, question and missing voice. | Discuss E after hearing it; dictate a corroboration plan with A/B IDs. | Sort period/later cards; arrange source gap tokens; use AAC to state next search. | Identify later interpretation and corroboration. |
| 9 | Write 90–130 words with A/C/D and B or E counterpoint. | Speak a 60–90-second argument; teacher transcribes source IDs and limit. | Fill argument weave boxes with source tokens and narrated links; photograph full labels. | Synthesise dated evidence without universal claims. |
| 10 | Check B in writing with G/H and two separate limits. | Hear G/H; state claim and limits orally before feedback. | Put G/H evidence tiles in two lanes and compose claim/limits with labels or AAC. | Test an overbroad freedom claim using fresh sources. |
Original SubjectNest route choices © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0.