Codes: AC9E9LA04, AC9E9LA06, AC9E9LY05. Goal: unpack a nominalisation and compare a compact claim with a log. Prepare: Text A/B and agency lens.
- Launch · 2 min. Ask what action is packed into Text B's
relocation: someone moved something. - Model · 5 min. “The relocation caused confusion” becomes “The crew moved the arrow at 9:20; two visitors later asked where to turn.” The first noun compresses the move and asserts a cause; the second names actor and observed questions. Neither proves why visitors asked.
- Guided reading · 6 min. Unpack
improvementinto who changed what, and ask where the claimedconfidenceappears in Text A. Demonstrate that nominalisation can also be useful after an actor/action is established: “The crew added a second arrow. This addition is recorded; its effect is not.” - Practice route · 6 min. D13-A/B/C: actor-action table, short spoken comparison or overcompression repair. Each route keeps a useful summary noun while naming the evidence limit.
- Exit · 4 min. Is
relocationalways poor writing? No. It can summarise a named move; it misleads if it erases a needed actor or adds an unsupported result. - Evidence note · 2 min. If pupils treat every abstract noun as deception, compare its precise and imprecise uses in two sentences.
Later: Day13 extra uses a sports inventory.