Codes: AC9E9LA04, AC9E9LY04, AC9E9LY06. Goal: edit an over-compressed notice into a short, attributed, cohesive paragraph. Prepare: Texts A–C, two-version editor.
- Launch · 2 min. Give audience: a reader who never saw the log. Ask what they need first: event/actor, not the phrase “this decision”.
- Model · 5 min. Compare B with C. Underline C's actor/action,
because,so,those two questionsand explicit final limit. C is a draft to critique, not a perfect official notice: itsitcan be clearer. - Guided reading · 6 min. With the class, replace that
itand remove B's unsupported “confidence returned”. Decide where one compact noun, e.g. “the sign change”, helps the second sentence refer back clearly. - Practice route · 6 min. D14-A/B/C: public note, 40-second audio/AAC script or side-by-side editorial memo. All give a clear referent, warranted connective, useful summary noun and bounded conclusion.
- Exit · 4 min. Identify the source detail that supports “two visitors asked” and the missing evidence for “confidence returned”. Key: Text A records two questions; no confidence measure/statement.
- Evidence note · 2 min. Save old/new wording. If the prose is elegant but more certain than the log, ask for one limit sentence.
Later: Day14 extra offers a low-ink 3-line version; no public posting.