Target/codes: Compare two human-designed prompt sequences for a named listener; AC9TDEFK01 and AC9TDEFP01, proposal only.
- Welcome · 3 min. A new listener wants to report a completed attempt without accidentally counting the interrupted one.
- Notice source · 4 min. Show ALL AT ONCE and ASK · CHECK · TELL. Both are untried service ideas; neither is automatically best for every user.
- Model · 5 min. ALL AT ONCE could let a confident reader scan everything; the sequence could help another reader pause at status. These are hypotheses about use, not measured outcomes.
- Child design talk · 7 min. Child gives one possible help and difficulty for each route, chooses one provisionally for a particular listener, and says what a real willing listener would need to do to check it.
- Check/respond · 4 min. Record both route features and user-linked reason. If “everyone needs the steps” appears, ask which listener and what exact feedback is missing. If the child equates completion with a farther mark, distinguish status from location.
- Exit · 2 min. “I would try ___ with ___ because ___.”