Target/codes: distinguish source statements, possible perspectives and an evidence-limited conclusion about signs/places; AC9HSFS03, AC9HSFS04, AC9HSFS05. Prepare: Pip/Ren cards, Source D signs, source/conclusion mat.
- Welcome · 3 min. Tell children the two voice cards and four signs are fictional paper sources; no real peer is being assessed or represented.
- Read · 4 min. Revisit Pip's REST SEAT and Ren's MAKER TABLE reasons. Show the corresponding two signs without claiming either person saw them.
- Model · 5 min. Separate “Ren says the table matters for designs” from “a MAKER TABLE sign might be useful to someone seeking it.” One is a quoted view; the other is a tentative inference.
- Independent route · 7 min. Day 8 A/B/C attribute one speaker's view, pick a matching sign and state one conclusion with might/intended/unknown, citing the card or label.
- Boundary check · 4 min. Ask “Did Pip or Ren actually test this sign?” No source says so. Record sign effectiveness as unknown.
- Exit · 2 min. Keep the child's source and inference separately. If the distinction blurs, next use a fresh two-column “says / might” example.