Target/codes: Compare two individual views and fictional permission statuses, then draft a two-source statement without broadening a voice; AC9HSFS01, AC9HSFS02, AC9HSFS03, AC9HSFS04 and AC9HSFS05 partial, AC9HSFK03 fictional concept rehearsal only.
- Settle/purpose · 3 min. Keep B private-note and C public-sentence cards visibly apart; stress that real consent would need actual school process.
- Read source · 4 min. Read Fin C exact sentence and fictional status allowing that sentence with Fin named. Contrast Emi B's not-yet-asked status.
- Model inquiry · 5 min. A identifies a story table; C gives Fin's reason. Model “Fin says the table matters to Fin for showing drawings.” Do not claim all visitors agree.
- Child response · 7 min. Child sorts B/C statuses and drafts a guide line with one A feature and Fin's exact permitted sentence or paraphrase clearly attributed.
- Check/respond · 4 min. Ask whether child expanded the scope of permission or quote. A paraphrase is learning evidence; a pretend guide should use only the exact permitted sentence if displayed.
- Exit · 2 min. Preserve first attempt; tomorrow's fresh check has different names and room features.
Next move: If Emi's quote enters the public draft, move B back under WAIT and discuss asking first. See routes and worked swaps.