All contexts below are invented paper situations. They give a teacher something familiar to discuss while keeping the image/choice target precise. They are not safety instructions, true place depictions, real advertisements or authorised community works.
| Day | Everyday bridge A | Everyday bridge B / boundary |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | A pretend playground map could start at one circle and offer two ending spots. | A handmade birthday game could offer two endings; neither is a time-ordered next frame. |
| 22 | A paper café menu might use distinct large symbols for two choices. | A pretend train card could use raised routes; avoid colour as the only difference. |
| 23 | A folded invitation can hide two possible picture surprises. | A cardboard game can reveal one ending and leave the other covered; the PDF is only a model. |
| 24 | An imaginary parcel card can show “start” before a choice of endings. | A paper sorting instruction can show one outcome after choosing; no universal suspense claim. |
| 25 | A new triangle fork transfers “hold A, change B.” | Use the fresh I first response before any unrelated supplementary fork. |
| 26 | A child-owned mini game can use removable broad cards for two routes. | A paper classroom notice can use two adult-prepared flaps; child owns content decisions. |
| 27 | A homemade game needs both choices tried after resetting. | A paper map can have a mismatch between a sign and displayed end; record what actually happens. |
| 28 | A library-style choice board can replace two similar signs with different shapes. | A tactile ticket board can use different broad outlines; no reading level inference. |
| 29 | A willing educator might choose one route of a child’s paper work. | A private puppet trial is also allowed but not actual-audience evidence. |
| 30 | A new shape-sign board asks for one repaired mapping. | Paper correction does not prove a real reader used the new board. |