Title: Again, Then Finish. Creator/source credit: SubjectNest by NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd, 2026. Type: original computer-created teaching model assembled for this pack; graphical section/cue plan and mathematically synthesized electronic sound. No named human composer or performer, recorded person, borrowed melody, cultural/community attribution or field-proven effect is supplied.
Documented author purpose: model a four-beat idea that can come again before a different planned ending, so teachers/learners can inspect cue-led form and children can direct their own tiny pieces. The proposed practical use is an invented puppet entrance/picture-show opening or music alone. Title/illustrations suggest a short repeat then ending; they do not prove actual show use, audience understanding, learner benefit or community importance. Child can choose another purpose, question the proposal or leave purpose unstated.
Actual supplied work: score SVG, searchable score PDF, honest source SVG, source PDF, exact linear/raised/no-sound access, candidate sound/complete transcripts. IDEA sound/wait/sound/sound, local1,3,4; ENDING sound/sound/wait/wait, local1,2. Main authored route GO IDEA AGAIN IDEA FINISH ENDING STOP. Local1–4 restart in each section. Alternate realization GO IDEA FINISH ENDING STOP uses one idea; same recipes/source/beat spacing. Sounds do not record a human cue being given/received, actual conductor or performer. Silence after final ending is intentional; no hidden speech/cues/metronome.
Rights: Original named work/score/words/synthesis © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd2026, CC BY4.0. Credit “SubjectNest by NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd”, source/licence and changes. Font retains separate DejaVu/Bitstream terms. No First Nations knowledge reproduced; own-work licence cannot grant third-party/cultural authority.
Actual encounter/response: local teacher reviews exact resource/access, presents this actual score/source through learner-chosen graphic/raised/exact description or separately cleared optional sound, accurately identifies computer-created status and stated teaching purpose. Ask “Why was this model made? What could someone try?” Save actual encounter/route and child's observed comment/question/choice/support. Source listing, copying or hypothetical child response is insufficient. Silent score/source response concerns actual graphic/compositional work and cannot establish aural encounter or received musical cues. This is narrow partial FE01 author-purpose exploration only; varied appropriate actual people/community works/contexts are still needed in the wider program.
Separate held gates: HUMAN LISTENING NOT DONE / DEVICE NOT APPROVED / LOCAL VOLUME NOT APPROVED. Whole-file human preview before playback; exact familiar live source/technique/makers/stop choices before realization. Record intended cue order separately from actual child/adult cue operator, maker, accessible received cue/timing observation and actual willing recipient/receipt. A synthesized file or no-sound plan does not establish any live event. No required recording, public upload, body action, family knowledge or performance.