Target: separate stated case evidence, interpretation and an unsupported claim. Prepare: Cards A/B/C and evidence ladder.
- Launch · 2 min. Read Card C's one commuter comment. Ask whether it proves most commuters have the same concern.
- Model · 4 min. Put “one fictional commuter reported hard-to-read text” on the stated rung; “some users may have difficulty” on the possible interpretation rung; “everyone dislikes the noticeboard” on the unsupported rung.
- Guided reading · 5 min. Compare Cards A and B: one community-based idea and one profit-based service. Name an actual card fact and a missing datum for each; distinguish purpose from proof of impact or profitability.
- Practice route · 7 min. Choose Day 1 route and make three claim/evidence/limit triples across two different cards.
- Audit · 4 min. Partner removes an invented population, profit or impact claim and identifies the evidence that would be needed.
- Exit · 3 min. “Does a single comment establish stakeholder satisfaction?” Key: no; it is one reported view in an invented case.