Target: synthesise P/Q/R by provenance and purpose, not by treating one text as a correction to all facts. Prepare: three labelled strips and foreground strip.
- Launch · 2 min. Put P's headline, Q's final line and R's “no complete sequence” together. Ask who wrote each.
- Model · 4 min. Place P as fictional published brief, Q as SubjectNest fiction and R as fictional internal evidence note. Only P/R specify the stipulated result; Q imagines a perspective.
- Guided reading · 5 min. Trace a safe chain: known final point → chosen headline → reader's possible impression → R's warning. Do not use Q to fill an absent match log.
- Practice route · 7 min. Choose Day 23 route. Make a three-source note with one detail and purpose per source, plus a claim that remains unknowable.
- Peer audit · 4 min. Peer marks each source label and checks whether a fictional image has become a factual statistic.
- Exit · 3 min. “Which source explicitly says we lack earlier play-by-play?” Key: P and R, with R directing editorial caution.