Codes: AC9E7LA02, AC9E7LY06, AC9AMA8C01, AC9M7N02. Goal: evaluate one number explanation against accuracy, navigation and access criteria. Prepare: Day17 draft and a private review partner or self-check route.
- Open · 3 min. Say a useful critique identifies a line and evidence, not “bad design” or a judgement of the maker.
- Model · 5 min. From Draft A, note equation true but symbols unexplained; from Draft B, show arithmetic wrong. Suggest one line: “Three 2s make
2³=8.” - Investigate · 8 min. Learners use three criteria: correct prime factors/product, traceable frame order, complete text alternative. Test each against actual draft evidence.
- Choice · 10 min. D19-A/B/C: peer audit, self-audit with cover-and-reveal, or two-version comparison. Make one justified revision and preserve the earlier line.
- Check · 6 min. Ask why a larger font cannot rescue
2³=6, and why correct math may still need a reader-facing explanation. Require one example from the source drafts. - Note · 3 min. Record content revision versus presentation revision; later test with an actual target reader only with school review/consent.
Later/home: Show a chosen adult a practice explanation if they wish; do not claim this is a field usability test.