Target/codes: Explain how a new, actually documented permission decision would change shareability without changing whose view it is; AC9HSFS01, AC9HSFS03, AC9HSFS04 and AC9HSFS05 partial, AC9HSFK03 fictional concept rehearsal only.
- Settle/purpose · 3 min. Say “if” before every hypothetical; no one has obtained a new real permission.
- Read source · 4 min. Compare fictional Emi status NOT ASKED with Fin's EXACT SENTENCE APPROVED. The contents remain their individual views either way.
- Model inquiry · 5 min. Offer a new hypothetical Emi card: “If Emi later gave explicit permission for one exact sentence.” Ask what could change in a pretend guide, and what still would not become true for everyone.
- Child response · 7 min. Child revises a second draft conditionally or explains why they keep Emi off it. They mark the new status as hypothetical, not obtained.
- Check/respond · 4 min. If the child writes as if approval happened, underline “if” and preserve original draft. Permission can be withdrawn in real use; local policy would govern.
- Exit · 2 min. Prepare a source-bounded explanation for a willing listener.
Next move: If shareability and truth are confused, use two separate toggles with same attributed sentence. See routes and worked swaps.