SubjectNest resource library

Foundation / Hass / Term 3 / Weeks 29 30 / Teacher

Development draft · local review needed

Teacher-only worked checks and next stepsFoundation HASS · T3 W29–30 · Teacher · Key And Next

Download editable text
Teacher copy · prompts and answer keys

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Open after preserving first child-controlled responses and exact assistance. Public formative checks use fiction, not secure exams or local K03 evidence. Read/scribe/access help is available without giving the conclusion. Accept source-supported equivalences through point, voice, sign, AAC, tactile model or adult-directed placement. Record task · exact child words/action · access source/route · model/prompt/assistance · next step locally, without learner data in the repository. Use observed independently / observed with support / not yet observable for each skill; do not turn one check/pass into a fixed label or grade.

Check A · Moss Room worked interpretation

  1. Source 1 is an earlier pictorial map: diamond box beside the left circle cushion; rectangle table right. The key gives those feature names. This depicts the fictional earlier location; it does not prove an actual room's current state, material, safety, access or observed real use.
  2. Keeper Fenn, Source 2, reports moving the box beside the table later. Child makes two representations: earlier beside cushion from 1; later reported beside table from 2. Keep 1 unchanged. Fenn's reason is not recorded; Zia's own reason cannot fill it. A report in fiction is not a real move directly observed by the learner.
  3. Source 3 is undated. It matches the earlier depicted position, but that alone does not establish when the copy was made. It could describe/copy an earlier view; the set does not settle its date or make it an automatic lie/error/current record. Keep 3 beside/outside known-time order. “When was this copy made?” or “Who made it and from what earlier source?” are useful future-source questions.
  4. Zia, Source 4, gives Zia's reason: laying out Zia's paper cards. One account: “Earlier map 1 shows box by cushion; later Fenn reports by table (2); after the move Zia says she found it by table and likes laying out cards (4); copy 3 has no time.” Zia's preference is neither everyone's nor Fenn's move cause. All sources remain fiction.

If a child changes A's original location, preserve the old map and revise only the child model. If they call C wrong because it differs, provide two new clearly timed drawings later and then an undated one. If a named preference becomes a universal/cause claim, separate speaker/cause/other-user pockets.

Check B · Harbour Room worked interpretation

  1. Source 1 depicts pentagon tub beside right oval mat; rectangle shelf left. Faye, Source 2, reports later move beside shelf. A proposed/current model based on 2 is labelled reported source, not directly observed real layout. Source 3 has the old depicted location but no time; retain its separate pocket rather than force a date.
  2. Rafi, Source 4, says the shelf location matters for putting Rafi's pretend leaf cards there. That reports Rafi's reason and encounter. Source 2 does not state Faye's cause. Other users' views, needs and conditions are not established; do not infer identity or universal accessibility.
  3. Source 5 is a planned picture update based on 2/4. The child may actually make/draw/direct a labelled map during the check; record that real child/adult action and assistance separately. The sources do not say the helper already finished the map, and no actual room/tub has been changed through the paper task. Plan, child model and physical-room action are different records.
  4. Valid account: earlier map 1; later move report 2; after that named encounter/reason 4; copy 3 undated; helper plan 5 still proposed. A useful question: “When was 3 made?” or “Would Faye like to say why?” An approved dated maker record or willing exact keeper account might help in future. No such source has been obtained; approval/consent is required for an actual extension.

If a paper update is counted as a physical move, mark the child's artifact CHILD MODEL and keep real-room observation blank. If a future source becomes obtained evidence, add PENDING and an empty date field. Keep the first check response intact before teaching.

Daily observation and next teaching

Day Look for in first child-controlled response Next small move in new context
141 A keyed feature and position on earlier child model; one gap. Match a new icon to its exact key before placing it.
142 Earlier representation retained; later model based on B; why open. Build a new two-window model with separate source tags.
143 Undated copy kept out of fixed order; useful time question. Compare two known-time pictures and one undated copy.
144 Tara's reason owned by Tara; short temporal source trail. Keep keeper cause separate from visitor meaning.
145 Fresh A: keyed place, two windows, undated pocket, named reason/account. Teach one emerging move with new marks/person, after capture.
146 Planned picture update separated from reported physical move. Use PLAN/MADE MODEL/ROOM OBSERVATION fields.
147 One sourced reason plus missing keeper/other-user information. Add speaker names beside exact reason words.
148 First/changed child maps retained; source for one revision. Attach source tab to changed piece only.
149 Earlier/later/undated gallery account and reader revision. Let a private listener locate each source/time tag.
150 Fresh B: source times, named reason, planned map versus actual child artifact. New-context practice for one emerging distinction.

Conditional K03 decisions from actual-place work

Use the complete actual-place route and element table, not the fictional check responses. Record actual approved place, child-recognised familiar connection, observed/described features/date/view, exact willing-person reason and local care procedure/explanation. A missing element is not yet observed; a child's pass is not inability. A correct care explanation can support how a place can be looked after, while actual care-action claims need actor/time/observation. No records were collected while authoring this pack. Partial evidence is not automatic complete row coverage/year-end attainment. K01/K02/K04 remain held for their separate authentic/authorised evidence under the local gate.