Target: write and visibly revise a short public reflection comparing S and T/U without flattening poem into data. Prepare: S/T/U and editor arc.
- Launch · 2 min. Set audience as an imagined garden newsletter reader who has not seen the sources.
- Model · 4 min. Offer a plan, not a full model: bounded count → selected metaphor/image → possible effect → missing future evidence → useful caption/question.
- Guided reading · 5 min. Test “The poem proves four planters will stay bare” against T's final line; model a narrower interpretation.
- Practice route · 7 min. Choose Day 29 route. Draft 120–160 words or an equivalent complete public transcript with one S fact, one T detail, one U framing point and a question. Keep before/after sentence.
- Peer audit · 4 min. Partner identifies a source-backed comparison and one line where the poem/data boundary could be clearer; learner revises and names the effect.
- Exit · 3 min. Submit draft, revision reason and support log. Offer more time for a finished version; speed is not the construct.