This sixth original fortnight follows the Term 1 two-source display mat with a new problem: a pretend picture curator has ten broad picture cards and needs a person-designed place to see each card once. Children compare a single row with two rows of five, propose their own layout, and, if school approval and materials allow, make and observe a large ten-place board. They then adapt a board for two pretend users by adding a visible card home and a clear “ready/in use” cue. No printed layout or proposed cue is a real user result.
The work pairs with integrated Week 11 “Ten ways to see” and Week 12 “Sharing tools and space”. The separate mathematics lessons teach number, ten and equal sharing; this Design pack assesses user, purpose, design choices, safe making and evidence-led evaluation. A ten-place drawing does not prove a child can count ten. A shared-use cue does not establish HPE consent or respectful-interaction achievement.
Begin with the safe kit and exact invented source. Run the ten distinct 25-minute scripts, three switchable same-goal routes per day, twenty worked context swaps, and eight original A4 SVG/PDF pages. Two fresh public child checks have a separate teacher key and next moves. Every optional home bridge works by talking or drawing, with no purchases, login, printer, cutting or physical test.
Evidence gate: The A4 board diagrams are plans; an actual trial uses school-approved large paper, broad blunt cards, a stable clear surface and adult preparation. Log who marked/handled the board, whether cards actually fit and remained in their places, and what a willing viewer actually did. If a trial cannot happen, mark NOT TRIED and use the complete spoken-plan route. A real familiar product/service/environment for AC9TDEFK01 needs a locally approved source and child observation; fiction does not fill that row by itself. No personal possessions, real disputes, classroom results or pupil data are supplied here.
The exact ACARA v9/QCAA Prep crosswalk, source/rights ledger, role run-through, offline verifier and SHA-256 receipt show what was checked. This is an author-reviewed draft, not a QCAA-endorsed unit, a completed Foundation Technologies course, a secure exam, a classroom trial or a validated child outcome.