ERAIS technical claim
research.adaptive_recurrence_benefit.v1
Does spending more steps on a task improve its answer?
Evidence maturity: BlockedSource-pinned record
Reviewed · neuroforge-io/erais
The wording and state below belong to this source snapshot. Related current context is separate from the recorded claim.
Approved wording · 12 July 2026
What the record says.
Adaptive recurrence benefit remains unproven pending matched evaluation.
Required evidence
- Frozen with/without-recurrence protocol, identical model and prompts, calibrated stopping bounds, enough repetitions, lm-eval quality, latency, memory, and energy where claimed.
Do not infer
- Do not infer reasoning improvement from extra recurrent steps or confidence heuristics.
Continue in context
Related work.
Explore the current context. It does not update this recorded claim.
Read the research programmeRead the state together with its scope and evidence requirements. Commercial availability and technical maturity are separate decisions.
Return to the complete register