Navigate

Quick find

Navigate NeuroForge

Esc

Start typing to search public pages and evidence.

    A$695k pre-seed / Queensland, Australia

    Help prove a different way to build intelligence.

    Today's AI often gets more capable by making the whole system larger and more expensive to run. NeuroForge is building ERAIS to test another path: add new capability, then use only the parts each task needs.

    NeuroForge is seeking A$695,000 for an 18-month plan. The plan assumes no customer, grant, partner, debt or founder-cash receipts. Public information only; not an offer to issue securities.

    NEUROFORGEIO PTY LTDACN 701 314 329 · ABN 87 701 314 329
    A$695kpre-seed capital sought
    18 monthsto reach clear research and market decisions
    Pre-revenueno funding or traction claimed

    What the company is building

    One architecture. One bridge. A practical way into market.

    ERAIS is the long-term architecture. Fracture explores whether existing learned capability can be brought across. The 10-Day AI Fit Test offers a way to work on present-day customer problems without asking buyers to depend on unfinished ERAIS research.

    01 / Architecture

    Build intelligence that does not have to use everything at once.

    ERAIS is designed to store many capabilities while applying only the appropriate tools and effort to each task. The next question is whether that advantage holds as the system grows.

    02 / Transition

    Bring useful existing capability with us.

    Fracture explores whether capability learned by conventional models can be converted into ERAIS structures. A bounded end-to-end research workflow already runs.

    03 / The company

    Build a small team with unusual leverage.

    NeuroForge combines human judgement, capable AI tools, clear coordination and retained evidence. Funding adds specialist expertise without losing the way of working that created the system.

    Looking to support a smaller project? Watch Minecraft AI live and choose voluntary monthly support. This is separate from investment and does not buy shares or game access.

    Completed assets

    An incorporated company. A working ERAIS research system. Public evidence controls. A defined commercial offer. A live technical-diligence site.

    Internal progress

    Long native-byte training runs have completed. Bounded Fracture, multimodal and governed paths run. Quality and scale remain live research questions.

    Applications + discussions

    Challenge 77 application submitted and pending. A CQU research proposal remains in draft for NeuroForge review.

    External validation

    No customer, partner, award, grant, investor, paid pilot or independent technical validation is claimed today.

    Why the lead can keep growing

    This is more than one model or one codebase.

    To catch up, a competitor would need the architecture, the conversion knowledge, the record of what worked and failed, the research tools, and the way NeuroForge puts those parts together.

    01ERAIS architecture

    Knowledge of selective execution, modular capacity, recurrence, memory and multiple kinds of input.

    02Fracture migration

    Knowing what survives conversion, what fails, and what needs to be repaired.

    03Research record

    Accepted results, negative results and decisions that do not need to be rediscovered.

    04Observatory and tools

    Systems for training, testing, tracking evidence, finding faults and restoring known-good states.

    05Way of working

    Human judgement and AI tools coordinated inside one disciplined research process.

    06Wider synthesis

    Biological, physical, computational and industrial insight that can eventually inform new hardware.

    Each useful result informs the next experiment. A competitor copying one snapshot would still need to reproduce the research record and the way it was built.

    Why Lloyd / why this model

    The operating model is already working.

    Lloyd Handyside draws on biology, physics, chemistry, big data, programming, industrial work and academic research exposure.

    That range of experience shaped ERAIS. AI turns one founder's time into far more research and engineering iteration—without handing judgement to the tools.

    Funding is not meant to preserve a one-person company. It adds researchers, engineers and operators who can use the same method inside one coherent scientific system.

    Read the founder story

    Use of funds

    Turn a working research programme into independent proof and commercial capacity.

    The plan stays lean. It pays for hardware and AI tools, independent validation, pilot delivery, essential business support, milestone specialists, and one support engineer only when field work creates the need.

    01

    Expand controlled hardware, quality, energy, and independent technical validation

    02

    Convert the system-fit audit into paid staged deployments and repeatable customer evidence

    03

    Add fractional business/administration, milestone specialists, and one support engineer only after paid field load

    04

    Complete security, legal, operational, and second-operator gates for customer-operated releases

    What 18 months must deliver

    Five clear outcomes. Not headcount for its own sake.

    The base case assumes no customer, grant, programme, research-partner, tax-incentive, debt or founder-cash receipts. Capital buys the time and evidence needed to make a clear next-financing or stop decision.

    The 10-Day AI Fit Test and staged deployment path turn the NeuroForge method into paid customer decisions now. ERAIS remains the architecture that determines the company's largest possible future.

    Independent answer

    An independent technical conclusion on the largest remaining ERAIS risk.

    Native ERAIS

    A clear quality, resource and continuation decision for the next native ERAIS stage.

    Paid field test

    At least one funded customer engagement with witnessed evidence and a real buyer decision.

    Customer operation

    A customer-operated release with security, recovery, second-operator and support boundaries.

    Next decision

    A documented decision to raise the next round, continue from revenue, redesign or stop.

    Aligned conversations

    • Early-stage investors who see the value of AI that fits real operating constraints
    • Deep-technology investors comfortable with explicit technical gates and controlled disclosure of proprietary work
    • Industry partners with one valuable, constrained AI application and a person empowered to decide
    • Research or compute partners who accept negative results and independent review

    Not aligned

    • Requiring a positive benchmark or asking us to hide a failed result
    • Pressure to publish implementation-sensitive detail as marketing proof
    • Assuming production readiness, customer traction or general model quality
    • Open-ended pilots without rights, acceptance criteria, owners or stop rules

    Capital and funded partnerships

    Help answer the questions that decide how large this can become.

    Capital funds the decisive experiments. The right introductions open conversations with buyers, research partners and independent technical reviewers.

    Start the conversation